Subject	close
Posted by	SactoTodd on May 31, 2001 at 1:39 AM
	This message has been viewed 13 times.
In Reply To	I saw SactoTodd dyno at 264 RWHP stock posted by Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) on May 30, 2001 at 08:31 PM
Message	. Todd (no reaction time) 246 ground pounding horsies 264 earth shattering pound feetsies '91 TT 33,688 miles (Damn Daily Driver broke, miles are piling up) '89 Mazda 323 GTX '67 Galaxie 500 Daily Driver, with $700 in brake mods, no compression on cyls 5 & 6. The "For when I get a bigger garage" list: '70 240Z - it started it all '79 RX-7 - best follow up car '71 Honda S600 - they are so damn cute '66 GT350H - Rental cars are so cheap! '69 Boss 302 - Why not? '86 SVO - best handling Mustang ever '90 Q45 - M5s and E55s cost a bit much '95 RX-7 - but only in Silver '91 TTZ - word - PURCHASED
Follow Ups	my dyno results (nearly stock Z) - Technomancer 20:10:54 05/30/01 Sounds right, 300hp - 15% Loss. Your about right there. (n/m) - BadZCar (FL) 20:18:47 05/30/01 I guess I'm used to hearing 20% losses - Technomancer 20:22:56 05/30/01 SAE is 15-18%, Stealths are like 34%. I find that my - BadZCar (FL) 20:32:51 05/30/01 I saw SactoTodd dyno at 264 RWHP stock - Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) 20:31:35 05/30/01 YO Steve, when you gonna quote my interior bud? :) - BadZCar (FL) 20:34:08 05/30/01 Yea...real dam busy... - Ste?myZ(ZtoyZ.NET©) 20:53:38 05/30/01 close - SactoTodd 01:39:31 05/31/01 Ah, so we got pretty much the same numbers - Technomancer 13:51:16 05/31/01 help me interpret the torque curve... - Technomancer 20:43:43 05/30/01 The Z doesn't have variable valve timing does it? I didn't - BadZCar (FL) 20:51:52 05/30/01 we have variable valve timing but not cam changing - Technomancer 21:01:52 05/30/01 exception: no timing change in 96 version, it was discontin. (n/m) - Technomancer 21:02:58 05/30/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.